Optimize resume

Content Leaked After Leaving OnlyFans or Privacy: What to Do

·9 min read

You closed the account, you’re already in a hiring process, and someone found the content circulating in a Telegram group or on a site that isn’t the original one. The immediate fear is that it costs you the job, but the right order of action protects two things at once: your legal standing and the hiring process, without letting one run over the other.

This guide lists the steps in the order that works: preserve evidence, file a police report, request removal from Google and the hosting site, get legal support, and how to handle the hiring process while all of that runs in parallel.

The Evidence-First Rule: no takedown, report or conversation with a lawyer works well without evidence saved beforehand. Prove first, remove later, do it in the reverse order and you lose the evidence along with the content.

Preserving evidence before requesting any takedown keeps you from losing what backs the case

The first impulse is to erase everything as fast as possible, but removal requests and reports depend on evidence, and that evidence needs to exist before the removal happens. Take a full-screen screenshot with the URL visible in the address bar and, if possible, the system date and time visible too.

Keep the screenshots in more than one place, like an email to yourself and a cloud folder, because a single point of failure (a lost phone, a locked account) can wipe out the only copy you had. Also write down where you found the content: the group’s name, the site’s link, the date you noticed it, without needing to keep the file itself beyond what the evidence requires.

The police report exists for exactly this, and it cites a specific article of the Criminal Code

Publishing, distributing or offering nude or sexual content without the consent of the person shown is a crime under article 218-C of Brazil’s Criminal Code, added by Law 13.718/2018, with a prison sentence of 1 to 5 years, increased when the person who published it had an intimate relationship with the victim.

When filing the report, bring the organized screenshots and cite article 218-C directly. That helps the police station classify the case correctly from the start, instead of treating it as a generic complaint about the internet.

Google’s form removes the search link, not the file on the site

Google has a form called “Remove personal explicit or intimate images,” available in Google Search Help, that takes the link out of search results and also offers the option to block future copies and filter similar results. That request greatly reduces the chance of someone finding the content by searching your name, but it doesn’t delete the file from the site or group where it’s hosted.

Getting the content off the site itself requires a takedown request made directly to the platform hosting the material, a separate process from Google’s form. The two requests don’t compete with each other, they solve different parts of the problem and are worth doing in parallel.

Free legal support exists and doesn’t require hiring a private lawyer

Beyond the police report, talking to a labor lawyer or a digital rights lawyer helps you understand the options specific to your case. Anyone who can’t afford that can turn to Brazil’s Public Defender’s Office, which provides free assistance and advises on both the criminal side and any labor rights involved, in case the leak affected a current job.

On the employment side itself, three labor lawyers interviewed by Correio Braziliense (2023) say that having had an account on an adult platform does not, on its own, constitute just cause for dismissal under article 482 of Brazil’s labor code, especially when the content never touched the employer’s image. A dismissal based only on that can be contested as discriminatory, and it’s worth challenging it before the labor courts. If the problem is a dismissal that already happened, see fired over an adult-platform account: just cause and your rights.

The hiring process keeps moving in parallel, and the general rule is don’t bring it up yourself

While the legal side runs its course, the hiring process doesn’t need to stop or be explained in detail. In most cases, the recruiter saw nothing and won’t, because background checks at Brazilian companies follow LGPD (Brazil’s data protection law) and rarely include that kind of screening (consent and legitimate interest limited to what’s relevant to the role). The real exposure, when it exists, is usually a plain Google search of your name out of curiosity, not a formal check.

Before: bringing up the leak in the interview before any question about it, out of anxiety over hiding something.
After: going through the interview normally, focused on the role, and only answering if asked directly, with a short answer and no detail.

If the question comes up, a brief answer closes the subject without leaving room for judgment. The point of the conversation is still to show you’re the right fit for the role, and insisting on long explanations tends to stretch out a subject most recruiters would rather not dig into. For the resume itself, see how to describe the period without naming the platform, and on exposure from a name search, what a recruiter can actually see on Google and LinkedIn.

Don’t let the leak set the pace of your job search

It’s natural to want to pause everything until the leak is fully resolved, but the legal process can take weeks or months, and your job search doesn’t need to wait for it. The two run in parallel: you file the report, request removal, seek legal support, and keep applying as usual.

What to do right now with your hiring process

The sequence that protects you is: preserve evidence, file a police report citing article 218-C, request removal from Google and the site, seek out the Public Defender’s Office or a labor lawyer if a job is affected, and keep the hiring process moving on the merits of your application. Not acting out of fear of other people’s reactions only prolongs the exposure, without protecting anything extra.

While that runs, keep your resume strong: run the free check at /ats with the job posting pasted in to see what your current text is missing. If the score comes back low, the full optimization costs R$ 7.80 via Pix at /checkout, and re-tailoring it for another job costs R$ 3.40.


Frequently asked questions

What should I do the moment I find out about the leak?

Before anything else, take screenshots of the page, group or site showing the full URL and the visible date on screen, and save the original files in more than one place. That evidence is what backs up a police report and any takedown request afterward, and it gets much harder to gather once the content has already been deleted or moved elsewhere.

Is leaking my content without my authorization a crime?

Yes. Article 218-C of Brazil’s Criminal Code, added by Law 13.718/2018, makes it a crime to offer, sell, distribute or publish sexual or nude content without the consent of the person shown, with a prison sentence of 1 to 5 years, increased when the offender had an intimate relationship with the victim. It’s worth filing a police report citing that article.

Does Google’s form remove the content from the internet?

No. It removes the link from Google’s search results, which already cuts the odds of someone stumbling onto it, but the file stays on the site or group where it was posted. Getting the content off the site itself requires a takedown request directly to the platform hosting it.

If the recruiter saw the content, should I bring it up in the hiring process?

In most cases there’s no need to say anything, because the content has no bearing on your ability to do the job. If the question comes up directly and you feel you need to answer, a short answer with no detail is enough, the conversation should stay focused on the role.

Can I be fired or disqualified from a hiring process over this?

Three labor lawyers interviewed by Correio Braziliense (2023) say that simply having had an account on an adult platform does not, by itself, constitute just cause for dismissal under article 482 of Brazil’s labor code, especially when the content was anonymous and never touched the employer’s image. A dismissal under those conditions can amount to discriminatory dismissal, and it’s worth contesting it before Brazil’s labor courts.

Can someone still pass a competitive public-service exam with this history?

Yes, there’s a public precedent: in January 2026, the public prosecutor’s office of Santa Catarina swore in as a prosecutor a woman who had passed its competitive exam and had produced adult content before, with associations and legal scholars arguing the facts predated the exam and had no bearing on her professional conduct (O Tempo, Jan. 2026).

How much does it cost to fix my resume while I’m dealing with this?

AjustaCV’s free ATS check, at /ats, shows your resume’s current score and which terms from the job are missing, at no cost. The full optimization costs R$ 7.80 via Pix (Brazil’s instant payment system), delivered by email in minutes, and re-tailoring it for another job costs R$ 3.40.

Want to optimize your resume for a specific job?

AjustaCV rewrites your resume to pass ATS filters for any job you choose. Ready in minutes.

OPTIMIZE MY RESUME — R$7.80